Skip to content
Cart
Bump Testing Gas Detectors: Why It Matters Every Time

Bump Testing Gas Detectors: Why It Matters Every Time

A calibration certificate feels like proof an instrument works. It isn't, not on its own, and treating it as if it is has cost lives.

The MOT comparison

A gas detector's calibration certificate works on the same premise as your car's MOT: on a certain day, at a certain time, it was verified to be working correctly. That's it. It says nothing about whether the instrument still works today, next week, or the next time someone reaches for it in a confined space.

Both certifications assume the instrument will keep functioning as it should for the next year, or whatever period the manufacturer specifies. But gas detectors are electrical, electronic, and chemical devices, and any of those can fail at any time, not just on the anniversary of the last calibration.

Why this matters more than most safety checks

Oxygen deficiencies, explosive atmospheres, and exposure to toxic gases injure hundreds of workers worldwide every year. The atmospheric conditions behind these incidents are usually invisible to the people caught in them. A gas detector is often the only thing standing between a worker and a hazard they can't see, smell, or feel coming.

The only way to know an instrument is actually capable of detecting that hazard right now is to expose it to test gas and confirm it responds correctly.

Bump test vs calibration check

A functional "bump test" briefly exposes the instrument to known concentration test gas. It confirms gas can reach and be detected by the sensors, that alarms trigger properly, and that any real-time display is reading accurately. It takes seconds, and no calibration adjustment is needed unless the readings come back wrong.

Some manufacturers draw a line between this qualitative "bump test" and a more precise "calibration check," which verifies the sensor's response falls within the manufacturer's accuracy requirements. The terminology varies, but the industry agrees on the outcome: if an instrument fails either check, it needs a full calibration before it's used again.

What actually causes sensors to lose accuracy

Different sensor types fail in different ways:

  • Electrochemical sensors, used for gases like carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulphide, aren't consumed by normal exposure, but they degrade over time and can fail suddenly at end of life. Exposure to organic solvents, alcohols, or methanol can permanently affect their performance.
  • Oxygen sensors typically use a fuel cell that consumes itself over its working life. Near end of life they can develop problems like abnormally slow response, which is why daily bump testing on oxygen sensors matters particularly.
  • Combustible gas sensors can be damaged by silicone-containing substances, chlorinated solvents, sulphides, or even high concentrations of combustible gas itself, alongside ageing, desiccation, or physical damage from drops or immersion.

Even a perfectly healthy sensor can fail to respond if gas can't physically reach it, due to a blocked pump, a leak in the sampling system, or a clogged filter. That's why even "zero maintenance" instruments still need periodic testing.

The consequences of skipping it

Failing to periodically test and document your gas detectors doesn't just risk a false reading. It exposes you to regulatory citations and fines, and significantly increases liability if a worker is injured because an instrument failed to alert them to danger. In a genuine incident, "it had a valid calibration certificate" won't carry much weight if the instrument wasn't actually tested before use.

Making it easier: docking stations

Manually calibrating instruments one at a time used to be the main barrier to doing this consistently. Automatic calibration and bump test docking stations have changed that: drop the detector in, and the station handles testing, calibration, and record-keeping automatically. Many also track the shape of the sensor's response curve, not just the final reading, giving useful diagnostic insight into sensor health over time.

As prices for these stations have come down, they've become worthwhile even for sites with only a handful of instruments, not just large fleets.

The bottom line

Direct reading gas detectors exist to keep workers safe in genuinely life-threatening environments. Testing them before every single use isn't excessive caution, it's the only way to know the instrument will actually do its job when it matters. As the BSIF's "Bump It" campaign puts it: there are no excuses.


References

This article draws on "Life Critical Gas Detectors – Why Test Every Time They Are Used?", published by the British Safety Industry Federation as part of its "Bump It" campaign, authored by Julian Butler (UK Sales Manager, GfG Gas Detection UK Ltd).